Category Archives: Democracy for Sale

Yes! Clinton Violated Election Law!

The internet exploded last night with news that Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s husband, former president Bill Clinton entered four polling places in areas around Boston. People on facebook complained that they were cordoned off and kept from voting as the royal procession of Clinton, Boston Mayor Marty Walsh their assorted security entourage were given way into the polling places.

Major news outlets have hounded the Secretary of State’s office with questions about how they interpret Clinton’s behavior or intentions. Unbelievably, as the Boston Globe quotes, Secretary of State Galvin didn’t seem too bothered by it all explaining, “He can go in, but he can’t approach voters,” Galvin said. “We just took the extra precaution of telling them because this is not a usual occurrence. You don’t usually get a president doing this.”

But Brian McNiff, the assistant for the Secretary had a different take earlier in the day, according to, “McNiff was asked if Clinton’s presence would, on its own, constitute a solicitation.

“He’s a well known person. And he’s a spouse of a candidate,” McNiff said. “That should answer the question.”

He declined to further elaborate.”

No doubt he was holding the bullhorn to warn voters of his presence at the New Bedford polling station and the law. “I must stay 150′ from you!” voters did not hear him say.

“By golly is it voting day here? Hey don’t mind me!”


Former president Bill Clinton appeared in New Bedford, Mass., on Super Tuesday in support of his wife, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

150′? What do you think?

Unfortunately once Secretary Galvin made his judgment clear to the press, the press then backed off and the dismissal was no more apparent than the top-running story on Google this evening posted by CNN Politics wherein Mr. McNiff, clearly stepping back in line told CNN that “…shaking hands alone isn’t prohibited. Explicit campaigning is what’s banned within 150 feet of a polling places.

“Just meeting people doesn’t constitute campaigning,” McNiff told CNN. “We received no information that anything like that happened.”

Celebrity power to influence? No way!

His office said it reached out to the Clinton campaign Tuesday “just to remind them about the 150 foot rule.”

So long after the fact, long after Clinton and his entourage had paraded through polling places barricaded to enable him to  shake hands, kiss babies and little old ladies, coming into the polling places to thank poll workers, Clinton was kindly reminded of election law.  Just in case this beginner in the ways of electioneering might forge, we suppose.

As Galvin admitted, one doesn’t usually have the experience of a presidential candidate having a spouse that ran the country as president for two terms.  No other presidential candidate or figure has ever had a spouse that just by virtue of their presence sends a message of Democratic and presidential power like Bill Clinton, much less the typical controversy and celebrity.  No other individual, certainly not a first lady, acting in such a close relationship to a candidate has gone and “worked” the polls the way Clinton did.

And on Super Tuesday, one could argue that there was no more contested or symbolic state than Massachusetts.  No other state could, if turned to Sanders, signal their possible defeat in all of New England.  No other state in the union has the legacy of Democratic power and strength than Massachusetts, no other state holds the tradition of establishment liberalism, than possibly California.

The Clintons knew they would have the south in the bag, but they knew that Massachusetts, as shown the night of the election as the returns bounced back and forth between Sanders and Clinton would be a bitter fight to the end.  They also knew they had an advantage; a tag team that could make that personal appearance, jump in the ring at the last minute and put the Sanders campaign in a twist with that final deadly move.

What’s most disturbing remains the fact that despite this flagrant violation of standard election law, officials decide to turn a blind eye.  With Trump’s making his presidential pitch sound more and more like a fascist take-over by an infomercial star and now this, one has to wonder does the slide down the slope get faster from here?

The Democratic National Committee has started a petition with to demand that Clinton’s forfeit their Massachusetts delegates:

We Demand the DNC Rescind Clinton’s Massachusetts Delegates Due to Breaking the Law!

Tagged , , ,

Chomsky: Democracy is a Threat to Any Power System

From video description :

“To mark The Nation’s 150th anniversary, John Nichols was joined in conversation by the eminent radical intellectual Noam Chomsky at the Tucson Festival of Books in Arizona on March 15. Discussing issues ranging from media accountability and voter participation, to money in politics and income inequality.”

Thanks to The Nation magazine

Tagged , ,

ALEC Violates Federal Rules Governing Non-Profits

The organization that formed with Ronald Reagan’s support in the 1980’s has drawn some attention for its active role in promoting and pushing pro-corporate agendas among legislative bodies throughout the country.  The act of promoting and representing the interests of any specific group to a government in an effort to sway that body to make legislation or rules favorable to the group paying or supporting the promoters is called lobbying.

[Learn more about ALEC from ALEX Exposed and Sourcewatch]

Most people think of lobbyists as existing on the national level.  Must media press makes mention of the Washington DC lobbying culture; of the money floating around Washington DC and of the revolving door of congress members from service in the house or senate to obtaining paid staff positions with lobbying firms.  It stands to reason; their high level of insider knowledge and their exposure to sensitive information through committee and top secret work enables these former public servants to charge a high price for their knowledge and insider access.

But many folks don’t consider the open market available to corporations on the state level.  In contrast to the competitive and sometimes difficult market of capturing a congress person’s attention can cost dearly.  In contrast state legislatures offer an easy to capture market of state legislators eager to make a name for themselves, a national media unable to micro-focus on ever state issue and a public not always paying attention to or taking seriously their state legislature.  But folks should take it very seriously, just as ALEC does.  Corporations, no matter how large know that often state regulations can often lead to federal regulations if the citizens gain success also that dismantling the regulatory system can best take place over the long term, one state at a time.

But not only has ALEC embraced pro corporate causes that attempt to break down citizen action regulations and ordinances, ALEC also has welcomed social conservative activist groups as well.  ALEC has provided the support and manpower to push national agendas by way of gaining restrictions on such issues as reproductive freedom, on a state by state basis.  The ulimate goal of such, as stated by pro-life groups for years, is that by causing restriction on the local level, people will be further and further removed from the concept of accessible reproductive services as they dry up in their community.  This creates apathy to the national struggle for reproductive rights and effectively knocks out pockets of opposition to the national effort to restrict a woman’s freedom of choice.

No 501 (c) 3

Federal tax law is explicit in its rules about the functions of a charity non-profit classified as a 501-(c) 3. As outlined on the Federal IRS page titled Activities Which are Permitted But Must be Limited the limits of the law are pretty clear”

Basic Rule

501(c)(3) organizations may engage in insubstantial amounts of lobbying
or legislative activity. The courts have generally interpreted this to mean
5% or less of overall activities, financial expenditures, staff hours
or other measurable standards. Organizations that exceed this guideline
will have their 501(c)(3) status revoked, unless they have filed IRS
Form 5768 to elect the more liberal limits of section 501(h). (Not all
501(c)(3)’s are eligible to make this election.)  The rules that follow
apply only to those organizations that have made the election.

Direct Lobbying, Electing Organizations

  1. Definition

General discussion of controversial issues does not, alone, constitute
lobbying. In order for the IRS to find that direct lobbying has taken
place, there must be three elements:

  1. Specific Legislation
    This could be a bill or other piece of legislation already introduced in
    the legislature, or a specific legislative proposal.
    b. Reflecting A View
    In order to be lobbying, a discussion must take a position with respect
    to (support or oppose) the specific legislation.
    c. A communication with a legislator or a government official

Special rule – Discussion of initiatives and referenda are considered direct
lobbying (subject to more generous percentage limits) even though
communication is with the general public.

  1. Limitations

If all three of these elements are present, you have “Direct Lobbying.”  The rules  
for an organization which has made the section 501(h) election are as follows:

  1. The organization is allowed to spend up to 20% of its overall budget
    on direct lobbying without penalty.
    b. If more than 20%, but less than 30%, of the budget is spent on direct
    lobbying, there will be a penalty tax, but the 501(c)(3) status is not in
    c. If expenditures for direct lobbying average more than 30% of the
    organization’s overall expenditures over a four year period, the IRS can
    take away the 501(c)(3) tax exempt status.

(Caution! If the organization’s budget exceeds $500,000 per year, these
“safe harbor” percentages are reduced!)

III. Recordkeeping

  1. Keep track of the total amount spent directly for this kind of lobbying – long distance phone calls, postage, travel, payments to lobbyists.b. Paid employees, if any, should keep logs to determine the percentage of their salaries and benefits to be allocated to lobbying.c. Arrive at a reasonable method for allocating overhead and similar costs to the lobbying activity.

Considering that the ALEC organization exists solely for the representation of groups and even development of favorable legislation for them with the goal of influencing legislators voting decisions, it appears that they clearly qualify as a lobbying group.  Why hasn’t the federal government revoked their tax-free status, fined them and make them pay back the money they have taken from the taxpayer?  Continue with the video from Undercurrent below on this topic:

Thanks to Matt at NH Labor News

Tagged , ,